ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÇÎËÎÒÀß ÌÅÄÀËÜ ÌÀÐÕÈ 2023
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2023/2024 ó÷. ã.
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
ÊÎÍÊÓÐÑ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
Êðàòêîñðî÷íûå ïîäãîòîâèòåëüíûå êóðñû 1.5 ìåñÿöà
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÓÍÈÂÅÐÑÈÒÅÒÑÊÈÅ ÑÓÁÁÎÒÛ
Âñåìèðíûé ôåñòèâàëü ìîëîä¸æè 2024
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC - EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL

2(39) 2017


ArticleSPATIAL CORE IN THE MUSEUM'S STRUCTURE
Authors E.V. Ermolenko, Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract

The article describes the main options of the core spatial changes in the structure of the Museum buildings. The first projects of public museums expressed the idea of "Museum as a temple of arts". The culture of the time created some semblance of a centric Church, with the main sacred space under the dome. Central rotunda carried a significant, important meaning, being not only spatial, but also semantic-composition. The twentieth century witnessed significant changes in culture, art and, as a consequence, the architecture of museums. The Central spatial core began to lose the value of the temple, memorial, gradually replacing the semantic value of the functional, communicative, entertaining, and finally, in the abstract, expressed a kind of compositional planning center. The article considers classical museums of the beginning of XIX century and modern multifunctional Museum complexes.

Keywords: spatial core, «light-well», the atrium, the classical scheme of construction, modern museum
article Article (RUS)
References

  1. Ermolenko E.V. Antichnye prototipy sovremennyh hudozhestvennyhmuzeev [Ancient prototypes of the modern art museums]. Habarovsk, 2015, pp. 95-100.
  2. Ermolenko E.V. J.M. Pej Prostranstvennyepostroeniya v muzejnyhzdaniyah [Spatial construction in the Museum buildings]. Moscow, 2010, no. 4 (552), pp. 54-64.
  3. Ermolenko E.V. Problemaprostranstvennogoismyslovogoyadra v strukture muzeya [The problem of spatial and semantic kernel in the structure of the Museum]. Moscow,2014, Issue.4, pp. 346-358.
  4. Kalugina T.P. Hudozhestvennyjmuzejkakfenomenkul'tury [Art Museum as a cultural phenomenon]. St. Petersburg, 2001, 224 p.
  5. Muzejilichnost' [Museum and identity]. Moscow, 2007, 168 p.
  6. Revyakin V. I. Sovremennye muzei mira.Uchebnoeposobie [Modern museums in the world.Tutorial]. Moscow, 2012, 352 p.
  7. YurenevaT.Yu. Muzeimira:istoriyaikollekcii, shedevryiraritety [Museums of the world: history and collections, masterpieces and rarities]. Moscow, 2011, 496 p.
  8. Boehm von Gero. Conversation with I.M.Pei. Light is the key, Munich, London, NY, Prestel Verlag, 2000, 128ð.
  9. Greub S.Greub, Th. Museums in the 21th century. Concepts, projects, buildings, Munich, Berlin, London, NY, Prestel, 2006, 225 p.
  10. Henderson J.Museum architecture. Glouchester, Massachusetts, J Rockport Publishers, 1998, 225 ð.
  11. Jodidio Ph.Architecture now.Museums, Taschen, 2010, 416 ð.
  12. Seemann E.A.The Neues Museum Berlin. Conserving, restoring, rebuilding within the World Heritage,Leipzig, 2009, 239 p.
  13. Speech:Museum2010, no. 4 (552), pp. 54-64.
  14. Steffens M.K.F.Schinkel. An architect in the service of beauty, Taschen, 2003, 95 p.